Contact Berry Law

Under the current AMA system, you have three main ways to appeal a rating decision, all of which are designed to provide Veterans with more choices and faster resolutions for their claims. The Appeals Modernization Act (AMA) fundamentally changed how Veterans can challenge decisions made by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and introduced these three distinct review options. These pathways are mutually exclusive for a specific issue at a specific time, meaning you must choose one path for a particular decision. These three options are: 1. Higher-Level Review: A senior reviewer checks your existing record for mistakes, such as errors in fact or law, without considering new evidence. 2. Supplemental Claim: You submit your appeal along with new and relevant evidence that the VA has not reviewed before. 3. Board Appeal: Your case moves directly to a Veterans Law Judge for review. Choosing the right path is a critical first step in the appeals process, and the deadline for selecting one of these options is generally one year from the date of the VA's initial decision letter.

When a TDIU rating is designated as Permanent and Total (P&T), it unlocks several significant benefits for both the Veteran and their dependents. Firstly, the P&T status stops routine future medical exams, giving the Veteran peace of mind that their compensation will not be reduced. More importantly, it opens up critical family benefits: - Chapter 35 DEA (Dependents' Educational Assistance): Provides monthly money for education and training tuition for eligible spouses and children. - CHAMPVA (Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs): Offers health insurance coverage for dependents if they are not eligible for TRICARE. - State Benefits: Often includes important financial relief like full or partial property tax breaks or vehicle registration discounts, depending on the specific laws of your state of residence. These benefits are a major advantage of achieving P&T status.

While meningiomas aren’t always cancerous, their growth can place dangerous pressure on the surrounding brain tissue, blood vessels, and nerves. This localized pressure can lead to severe and life-altering neurological symptoms. Many women affected by these tumors report experiencing chronic and worsening headaches, sudden vision changes such as double vision or blurring, hearing loss, or ringing in the ears. Other common warning signs include memory issues, loss of smell, unexplained seizures, and weakness or numbness in the limbs. If you have a history of using Depo-Provera and have experienced any of these symptoms, it is vital to seek immediate medical evaluation. A proper diagnosis via an MRI or CT scan is the first step toward addressing the health impact and establishing a foundation for any future legal claim.

Compensation for a traumatic brain injury is intended to cover both economic and non-economic losses. Economic damages include current and future medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, therapy for cognitive or physical impairments, and lost wages if you are unable to work. We also pursue non-economic damages, which address the "human" cost of the injury, such as pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and the strain placed on your personal relationships. Because TBIs are often catastrophic, the long-term impact on your livelihood can be significant. Our goal is to calculate a settlement that accounts for these ongoing needs, ensuring you aren't left paying for the consequences of someone else’s mistake. We pursue compensation for documented current and future losses.

No, property owners are not considered the "insurers" of a visitor's safety, meaning they are not automatically liable for every single accident that occurs. A property owner is generally only held responsible if the injury was caused by a condition they knew about or should have reasonably discovered. If a hazard is sudden, completely unknown to the owner, and could not have been reasonably prevented, the owner may not be held liable. However, owners have an ongoing obligation to perform regular inspections and provide reasonable warnings. The courts evaluate whether the owner acted as a "reasonably prudent" person would act under similar circumstances to minimize risk to those lawfully on their property.

Veterans can challenge an unfavorable decision through a Supplemental Claim, a Higher-Level Review, or an appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals. The best option depends on the facts of the case and whether additional evidence is available.